Posts Tagged With: Traveller 2200

LOL, a blast from the past…

So, I’ve pretty much decided that I want to run my Imperium or “Traveller 2200” or “CyberTraveller” game again at some point. This is a non-canon Traveller setting, increasingly more Proto-Traveller in function, that I ran using the CP2020 engine rather than any of the various Traveller rules. I have a particular campaign that I’ve run multiple times explicitly exploring multiple different timelines of the same start at a fixed point in time.

Why is it fixed, no idea, maybe that’s something to explore this time around..?

In any case, due to my computer crash a couple of years ago I lost all of the files that I used to keep for this campaign. What I do have is a flat document box that I have now filled with old paper notes and records from the previous campaigns (the stack sits like 2-3 inches high). It’s definitely been a journey down memory lane with these, and most amusingly I came across my original, CP2020 character/NPC from the very first CP2020 games that I ran.

That brings back some real memories!

But for the new Imperium game, I have to decide what rule engine to use. Previously I’ve used CP2020 because I can run that game in my sleep. For a long period of time that was my primary game/system, and it’s only been in the last few years that I returned to D&D. That said, I like Mongoose Traveller, but I refuse to buy a whole new second edition of it (and it doesn’t really need it) and Traveller 5E, while having some great elements, is basically unplayable as it stands at the moment.

So I am either going to run it using CP2020 or the Cephesus Engine. The Cephesus Engine (CE) is a based on the Traveller ORD, and is mix of Mongoose Traveller (itself a very simplified version of Traveller 5E) and Classic Traveller – stripped of any reference to the Traveller canon and suitable for use with pretty any scifi setting. The nice thing about CE is that I can include things from pretty much any edition of Traveller (save New Era) nd it ports into it pretty much seamlessly. I was also able to legally purchase it in the form of an editable Word document (because it’s an ORD) and can then customize it however I like for my own setting, etc.

Fundamentally, CP2020 is pretty easy and fun, but CE is also pretty easy and fun as well. It would be nice to run a Traveller game actually using a set of Traveller rules again. And the rules reflect a game that it is pretty easy to create whatever sort of character you want – much like CP2020.

Heck, maybe I just want to a play a game that only uses d6..




Categories: FYI | Tags: , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Which Imperium is Lost?

I’ve been spending a fair amount of time thinking about ProtoTraveller, as well as my idea of the “Lost Imperium” setting actually being a Traveler game rather than a Dark Heresy game. Another interesting spin that combines that idea with the canon Traveller universe would be a similar  “trip over a Ancient’s trapdoor” during either the Civil War or the Psionic Suppressions.

It doesn’t quite answer the question though – an full-sized WH40K Expeditionary Fleet of the Great Crusade had enough people to found a empire. Whatever it is that meant to escaped from the Traveller universe wouldn’t be nearly so big (ok, I suppose I could posit some other weird Jump Space effect hat simply captures a bunch of ships all at one time or something).

Just something I ponder while I wait for the D&D 5e game to come about!


Categories: Campaign Development, Game Design | Tags: , , , , , | Leave a comment

And now for the morning news…

Yeah, I’ve been busy with work and not paying attention to my long-neglected blog here…

Let’s see here, I pledged to a handful of Kickstarters – the CoC 7th Edition, the Islands of Ignorance Companion, and I’m hopeful that I’ll see my copy of Sense of the Slight-of-Hand-Man soon as well. I *really* want my copy of Pulp Cuthulhu now…

I finally received my copy of the new Traveller along with all of my goodies. As much as I wanted to love it, it’s kind of a trainwreck. Not so much in the rules themselves but in the sheer disorganized mess that the rulebook is. All of the -Makers in there, while I can understand why they are a part of the main rules given the history of Traveller, just add a huge level of confusing bloat given the lack of good organization.

Some of the ideas I really liked, the changes to character generation were actually pretty decent as near as I can tell (again, some of the lack of organization creates some real confusion). I look forward to integrating the new rules as part of my CyberTraveller 2200 campaign – I’ve always integrated Cyberpunk Lifepath with the Traveller Extended Character Generation in some very cool ways.

On a totally different note, I’ve gone around and been poking at the old “Chicago Unseen” setting that my spouse first ran and that we then ended up running together. It was a oWoD mashup based on the Mage game, but as much as we used much of the canon setting we trashed much more, and eventually couldn’t keep using such a cool but almost impossible to use magical system. So what I’ve been doing is looking at the old Witchcraft and Armageddon games first by Myrmidon Press and later by Eden Studios. I’ve had copies of the original rules for awhile now and always thought they would make a decent alternative to the White Wolf rules. I’ve bought things like Dresden Files and Savage Worlds hoping that these would be the solution but as decent as they are I just could quite make then work.

The Unisystem rules really seem to fit the bill, as long as being simple enough to tweak those couple areas that we’d need to manipulate to create a vision of an occult world that fits our own better. Plus, the existence of the multiple power levels available when looking at both games combined is a real benefit. We’d ended up with characters and NPC’s who arguable would have been Avatars and Inheritors (or Enlightened) by the time we gave up on the oWoD rules and it would be nice to have a rules-set that would allow this more easily.

Categories: FYI | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Create a free website or blog at